Trump plans to reduce the education department; the fate of economic assistance is unclear

President Trump said on Tuesday that his plan reduced the U.S. Department of Education, saying that he had told the secretary Linda McMahon that he hoped that she would “make herself unemployed.” In order to achieve his goal, education was transferred to the United States.

Trump said at a press conference of the oval office: “I believe in the choice of school, but in addition, I hope that states can go to school, and I hope Linda can withdraw from work.”

He has not issued an administrative order to show that the campaign is sworn in to eliminate the department, but it shows that the procedure will develop with the development of Congress. When asked if he wanted to issue an order, Trump said, “I think I will cooperate with Congress … We must cooperate with the Teacher Union, because the teacher union is the only teacher union that opposes it.

McMahon was once the tycoon and small business champion defeated by his own, and has not been confirmed.

The prospect of demolition of the Ministry of Education has caused people’s questions and concerns about potential chaos, that is, the key responsibilities and billions of dollars (including the processing of federal fiscal assistance, the gift funds of the disadvantaged group and the gift of civil rights law enforcement) Essence

The department has the power of financial life, and these campuses and students depend on. The K-12 program of the department provides services for 50 million students studying for 130,000 public and private schools; federal donations, loans and diligent workers seek assistance from post-students with more than 13 million middle school students.

Student loans also belong to the power of the department. Conservatives criticized the student loan procedures, and the Republican state successfully sued the Bayeng government to cancel many attempts to cancel the national shocking federal student loan debt. According to the Ministry of Education, more than 43 million Americans owe government loans of more than $ 1.5 trillion.

California’s dependence on federal funds

California has huge shares in the operation of the department. According to the Ministry of Education of the California, the state has received more than $ 2.1 billion in title I to offset the impact of poverty-more than any other state, of which 417 million US dollars provided $ 417 million to Los Angeles.

There are more than 200,000 low -income students in the California State University system. They are the largest and most diverse four -year higher education system in the United States. Each year, it relies on a US $ 1 billion federal Perch gift to the university. At the University of California, in the 2023-24 school year, more than 80,000 undergraduates received approximately $ 454 million Perch gifts.

However, Trump and many Republicans have been opposed to federal agencies for a long time, because waste and ineffectiveness believe that they should be educated in the states and localities closest to the family.

The opponent vowed to fight against any administrative order of the elimination department.

“If it becomes reality, Trump’s power robbing will steal resources for our most vulnerable students, the scale of explosion class, cutting work training plans, making higher education more expensive, and unable to achieve middle -class families. Student civil rights protection, “National Education Association. President Becky Pringle said in a statement on Monday. “Americans have no voting support or support, and the federal government is committed to ensuring the equal educational opportunity of each child.”

What role does Congress play?

Change or redirect the countless functions of the department. These functions involve the functions of each school district, university and university obtaining federal funds, which is a difficult and complicated task.

Many people question whether Trump has the right to demolish the departments established by Congress or refuse to provide funds provided by federal legislators. There is also a legal issue for whether the president can unilaterally transfer the function from one branch of the government to another branch. If the approval of Congress is required, Republicans only have a narrow majority in the House of Representatives and the Senate, and the potential Democratic leaders in the Senate may stop the move.

Michael Petrilli, chairman of the Thomas B. Ford Ham College of Ham College, said the department was “quite assumed” to close the department.

He said: “To demolish the department, Republicans have no voting at all, let alone this is an unpopular move in many Republican regions.”

In 2023, 60 Republicans (including 5 of 11 California) joined 205 Democrats to vote for one amendment. The amendment will support the power of the Ministry of Education’s management K-12 plan. The amendment was considered a pioneer of the department and failed.

The debate on the role of the federal government in education is nothing new.

The Ministry of Education was first established by President Andrew Jackson in 1867, but was abolished one year later, and its functions merged into other federal government. Democratic President Jimmy Carter asked Congress to rebuild an independent department in 1979. His Republican successor Ronald Reagan tried to eliminate it but did not succeed. Since then, the department’s efforts have been continuing, including a bill proposed last month last month.

Rick Hess, a senior researcher and research director of the American Enterprise Academy, said that because he called a waste of expenditure, the political prejudice to the teacher trade union and the teacher trade union was canceled or at least reduced the department. The “completely reasonable” responsibility was wrong. For example, he and Petrilli questioned why educational bureaucrats should manage trillions of student loan portfolios, not financial experts from the Ministry of Finance. This is this class advocated by Project 2025. This is a conservative policy policy The script, part of the first member written by the first member, and written by the first member. Trump administration.

But Liz Sanders, a spokesman for the Ministry of Education of California, expressed uneasiness to any attempt to abolish the department.

“We are very worried that it seems to be an unpleasant way to change the basic federal plan. We support our children every day and provide support for our most vulnerable children every day. We are talking about basic academic support services,” Sanders said Essence “We must ensure that these services can be a educator, our families and students have certain continuity. It is just a single ax job that is not how we should affect children’s changes.”

At present, educational leaders are waiting for more clear signs of Trump’s plan.

“If this is completely cutting costs and plans,” said Pedro Nogura, the dean of the Academy of Education, said, “if this is about mobile tasks and people who perform it to other institutions, it is difficult to see it. Cost reduction.

“It is difficult to know what it will happen or why, because if so, they do not really know the strategy.”