Trump’s Federal Investigation Bureau Draft right Kash Patel tried to persuade senators to confirm the hearing

President Trump chose Kash Patel’s loyalty to President Trump.

While trying to go with the far -right colleague and his own public statement, Mr. Patt was a self -confronted Trump loyal supporter, and even hinted that he did not agree with Mr. Trump’s decision. He On January 6, the decision to pardon the riot of attacking law enforcement agencies. Officials. This is the rare difference between the president. He chose his most powerful law enforcement agency in the United States.

当被问及他是否同意特朗普先生在就职之日的宽大赠款时，帕特尔先生是国会工作人员兼国家安全助手帕特尔先生说，他“经常，公开和私人地说，他It is said that there will never be tolerance to the violence of law enforcement. “

The nomination of Mr. Patt, 44, subverts the tradition of the water gate, and selects directors of the Federal Investigation Bureau of the Federal Investigation with extensive law enforcement experience. If it is confirmed, Mr. Patt can provide Mr. Trump with a route directly entering the bureau, thereby eliminating the guardrail designed to interfere with the White House.

Although the hearing resolved a series of problems caused by Mr. Patt’s behavior and statement, the Democrats repeatedly accused Mr. Patt in the priority to consider his loyalty to abide by the rule of law by Mr. Trump, but the nominated Said for forcibly deny it.

When the Hawaiian Democratic Senator Mazie K. Hirono asked him if he planned to investigate the former Federal Investigation Bureau James B. Kemi (he thought he might have committed a crime.

Mr. Patt said that when he was asked if he planned to investigate his direct predecessor, Christopher A. Wray, he would not be “backward”. Mr. Patt attacked the bureau in the investigation of Mr. Trump.

“Will you lie for the US President? Will you lie for Donald Trump?” Cory Booker, Senator of the New Jersey Democratic Party, asked, and his voice shouted.

“No,” Mr. Patel replied.

Mr. Patt has repeatedly accused the bureau’s leadership weapon aiming at Mr. Trump’s huge power weapons and weapons. He told the committee that he believed that 98 % of the federal investigation bureau was composed of “brave and brave non -politician warriors as justice warriors as justice warriors. They only need better leadership. ” “

He did not explain how he was sure of the other 2 % of the other 2 %, about 760 people composed of 38,000 employees.

Mr. Patt said that his main goal of being a director is to combat violent crimes and protect the country from three major national security threats-terrorism, Chinese espionage and Iran’s aggression.

It is unclear whether Mr. Patel has enough Republican voting to be confirmed, although Republicans have expressed their victory. When he was appointed in November, the Democrats believed that he had attracted people’s opposition to Mr. Trump’s firm loyalty to Mr. Trump and the past of the Federal Investigation Agency.

It hasn’t happened yet. Mr. Patt’s hearing and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard also controversially confirmed the hearing. However, this did not seem to cause a political fire, which threatened his nomination, which destroyed the support of the Republican majority.

To some extent, it is because Mr. Patt uses a precise duck strategy like many Trump candidates: Mr. Patt said, he does not remember the plot that is not flattering or damaged the alliance Details. He answered specific queries and made a comprehensive summary. Even if they were read to him with verbatim, he accused him of distorting his words.

When Richard J. Durbin, Senator in Illinois is the highest Democrat of the judicial committee, asked him why he appeared at the podcast hosted by Stew Peters, and then Instead of expressing anti -Jewish and white people’s views, Mr. Patt claims that he does not remember.

Mr. Dubin said: “You have eight independent on his podcast.”

When Mr. Dubin wanted to know why he contacted such a large number of extremists and conspiracy theorists, Mr. Patt provided an extraordinary answer that made the Democrats weird: he said he went to such podcasts to “” Reject their false impression and talk to them about the truth. “

Mr. Patt alternated between respect and resistance. He also said that he “rejected Qinon’s lasliest conspiracy theory”. Before, he said that he agreed to the “many” of the movement.

During several exchanges, Mr. Patt denied that the appendix of his book “Government Gangs” included the list of 60 people was the enemy list. The list aroused profound concern, that is, he will deploy the extensive power of the bureau to punish Mr. Trump’s political opponents or those in the government in the government.

Patt said: “This is not the list of enemies.” “This is a completely wrong demonstration.”

Under the inquiry of Peter Welch, a Fermont Democratic Senator Peter Welch, Mr. Patt repeatedly refused to say Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Welch said: “The other is that he won.” “Just say that Bayeng won the 2020 election, what difficulties?”

The most painful exchange of the day was the California Democratic Senator Adam B. Schiff, a California Democratic Senator, who had repeatedly conflicted with Mr. Patt for many years, accusing him of disrespectful to disrespect in the attack on January 6th on January 6 The injured police officer’s service raised funds to raise funds to raise funds for the imprisoned buildings.

Mr. Hiva urged Mr. Patt to turn around and sit on his chair, watching officials who provide security guarantee for the hearing.

Mr. Sifier urged Mr. Patt to speak to the officer, “You have the courage to look at them.”

Mr. Patt didn’t.

Nevertheless, Mr. Patt seemed to have appreciated the spotlight. With the delay of the hearing, Patel became more relaxed and confident. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democratic Party, reminded her that according to the regulations of the committee, he only asked him for a few minutes, thereby revealing a tricky question.

The leaders of the judicial committee set the party tone of the hearing in the opening speech. The Edbal Republican Senator Charles E. Grassley is the chairman of the group. He depicts a portrait of a Political Federal Investigation Bureau. He said that this is a “crisis”. People accept this feature in doubt. Democrats picked out the harsh statement of Mr. Patt’s institution he tried to lead.

Mr. Dubin said that Mr. Patt “does not meet the standards” to lead the Federal Investigation Bureau because he lacks experience in law enforcement and is unswervingly loyal to Mr. Trump.

Mr. Trump chose to operate the Ministry of Justice, and Pam Bondi has assured the Senators that if she is recognized as the Minister of Justice, there will be no such perceptual competitors. However, the sudden fire of investigating Mr. Trump’s prosecutor raised a question, whether Mr. Patel would carry out a retribution because he and the president have long promised.

Especially, in the past, and the current agent worried that Mr. Patel would conduct investigators who investigated the 2016 campaign of Mr. Trump, in view of him and the president repeatedly condemned the scam. The department’s top regulatory agencies and special consultants of the research and investigation of the survey concluded that this was legal.

Mr. Patt vowed to reshape the Federal Investigation Bureau significantly, but it is still unknown whether it is real or bomb.

Mr. Trump’s choice of Mr. Patt was unusual in many ways-the most important thing is that he advocated his right to amend the fifth amendment to avoid crimes.

He quoted his rights while reviewing Trump’s repeated refusal to return confidential documents. It is believed that Mr. Patel’s public claims to be asked about all government documents preserved after Mr. Trump left after his office.

According to people familiar with the matter, at first, Mr. Patt refused to answer the fifth amendment. The prosecutor finally approved Patel’s limited exemption to find out what defense he might provide for his former boss (if there is).

Democrats repeatedly released his testimony to Mr. Patt, but he refused.

At the hearing, John Cornyn, a Senator in Texas, was one of the most advanced Republicans in the Chamber of Commerce. He predicts that Mr. Patel will be recognized as “voting with the party” after some quarrels.

In a real form, Republicans rally around Mr. Patt, aside from his qualifications and the overall adaptability of the Federal Investigation’s investigation into the Federal Investigation Agency’s overall adaptability in the investigation of Mr. Trump.

However, in private, many Republicans expressed their reservations about their temperament and urged him to act responsible (and independence) in a responsible way, if confirmed.

John Kennedy, a Republican Senator in Louisiana, is one of the few members of the committee’s major seats that remind these worries, and provides picky but sharp suggestions to Patel.

“Don’t go there to burn that place there; Mr. Kennedy said.

Alan Feuer Contribution report.