Jay-Z.
Kevin Mazul/Getty Images of Record AcademyLitigation allegations Jay-Z The rape has been officially dismissed.
According to the document obtained US Weekly On Friday, February 14, the lawsuit was “dismissed by prejudice.” The rapper’s real name is Shawn Carter, who raped a 13-year-old girl, the document says. Sean “Didi” comb At the MTV Video Music Awards ceremony in September 2000.
“Fake cases against Jay-Z should not be brought about, and have been dismissed by prejudice,” Jay-Z’s lawyer Alex Spiro In a statement said us On Friday. “By facing outrageous false accusations, Jay did very little things – he pushed back, never settled, he never paid a penny for 1 bonus, he won and cleared his name .”
Jay-Z made a social media statement about his company, Roc Nation.
Attorney Alex Spiro shares new insights into his client Jay-Z’s response to recent rape allegations against him. “He was frustrated,” Spiro, 41, said during a roundtable meeting at the New York City News Agency in New York City, New York City, in Roc Nation on Monday, December 16. “The United States attended the news on Monday. “He was frustrated that someone was allowed to do so, […]
“Today is a victory. The rash, fictional and shocking allegations have been dismissed. This civil lawsuit has no merit and will never go anywhere.” Jay-Z shared on Friday via X. “The fictional stories they created are ridiculous, if not for the seriousness of the claim. I don’t want anyone’s experience. My wife, my children, loved ones and the trauma I endure will never be fired.”
Although the music tycoon was happy with him, he expressed sympathy for the victims of sexual assault, while those who were wrongly accused.
He continued: “Of course, the court must protect the victims and despite the same moral responsibility, the court must protect innocent people from being accused without a large amount of evidence.” “Please all victims and those who have been wrongly accused of Prevailing.”
Both stars have repeatedly denied the allegations. January 2, Judge Analisa Torres The Southern New York District approved the request of Attorney Jay-Z to dismiss the case based on procedural grounds.
Spiro’s request was in a December 30 letter to Torres, which stated that under New York City’s Gender Motivated Violent Protection Act, Jay-Z could not indict the prosecution because it did not take effect until after alleged rape.
The law was not implemented until December 2000, three months after the VMA that year. It has also been revised in 2022 to allow people to propose a two-year window to make historical claims that may pass statute of limitations.
Spiro thinks it’s OK.
He wrote: “Under the law, the plaintiff cannot retract his sole claim under the Gender Motivation Violence Protection Act (GMV Act) (GMV Act) because there is no retroactive effect of the regulation.”
Tony Buzbeea lawyer who is believed to be the victim of Jane Doe, said Spiro’s arguments were contrary to the intent of the law.
“The defendant’s argument about GMVA is unconvincing because it goes against the main intention of the law: making it easier for gender-motivated victims of violence to seek civil remedies in court rather than defendants, making it more difficult, Making it more difficult, according to court documents obtained by legal affairs journalists, he wrote Meghann M. Cuniff.
Meanwhile, Jay-Z sued Buzbee, accusing him of extortion and defamation. Buzbee also filed a lawsuit against Jay-Z and its company, Roc Nation, claiming it bribed its clients to file lawsuits against his company, threatening former clients and impersonating state officials. Rock National calls the accusation “Bowney”.
