France bill will ban headscarves in the movement; Amnesty International says it is discriminatory

• During the game, a bill will be held in the House of Lords of the French Parliament that prohibits all “seeing religious” clothing and symbols (including headscarves).
• Amnesty International urged French lawmakers to reject the bill, saying it was discriminatory.
• The House of Commons in the French Parliament will have the final say. To pass there, the bill would require a general uncooperative force alliance.

Amnesty International urges French lawmakers to reject a bill this week that would ban headscarves in all sports games.

The bill, supported by right-wing senators, will be debated in the House of Lords in the French Parliament on Tuesday. Its purpose is to prohibit all “surface religious” costumes and symbols during the competition. Amnesty International said the move would be discriminatory.

The vote might cheer on the lingering debate about secularism – it established it as the principle of the French Republic for more than a century after the 1905 law on the separation of the church and states.

French national team LAFC star Olivier Giroud has $500,000 watch stolen at home

So far, the Sports Federation has been free to decide whether to allow headscarves, as well as the country’s two most powerful sports, football and rugby, choosing to ban them.

The bill is in its early stages, with this week’s vote marking the beginning of a long-term legislative process with uncertain results. Even if the Senators vote in favor, the future of the bill will be unclear because the House of Commons has the final say.

To pass, the bill would require a coalition of troops that usually do not cooperate in the deeply divided House of Commons.

Amnesty International’s call came at French sprinter Sounkamba Sylla said she was banned from opening the Paris Olympics last summer because she wore a headscarf. She was eventually allowed to attend, wearing a hat to cover her hair.

France implemented a strict “laïcité” principle, which was loosely translated as “secularism”. The chairman of the French Olympic Committee said its Olympic athletes were bound by secular principles of the country’s public sector workers, including bans of hijabs and other religious signs.

“At the Paris Olympics, France’s ban on French female athletes who wore headscarves to compete, has caused international anger,” said Anna Błuś, an Amnesty International Gender Justice Researcher.

“For only six months, the French authorities not only doubling the discriminatory hijack ban, but also trying to extend it to all movements.”

Experts appointed by the UN Human Rights Commission have previously criticized the French Football and Basketball Federation’s decision to exclude players wearing hijabs, as well as the French government’s decision to prevent its athletes from wearing hijabs to represent the country in Paris.

Amnesty International said the real-life bill excludes Muslim women and girls from sports if they wear headscarves or other religious outfits.

“laïcité… is theoretically embedded in the French Constitution to protect everyone’s religious freedom and is often used as an excuse to prevent Muslim women from entering French public spaces,” Amnesty International said.

“For years, French authorities have formulated laws and policies in discriminatory ways to regulate clothing for Muslim women and girls. The Sports Federation follows the example and imposes a hijacking ban in several sports.”

Two years ago, France’s Supreme Administrative Court said that while the measure could limit freedom of speech, the country’s football union would have the right to ban headscarves during games.

The country’s football federation has mastered the principles of religious neutrality contained in the constitution and will not make it easy for international players who want to go from dawn to sunset during the Islamic Holy Moon.

Click here to get the Fox News app

Supporters of the bill cite an increasing attack on secularism in sports, believing that its core values ​​are based on the principle of universality. They said that in order to protect the stadium from any non-sports confrontation, neutral principles need to be implemented to ensure that any political, religious or racial demonstrations or propaganda cannot be promoted.

The bill also states that using part of a sports facility as a place of worship would be an abuse of its purpose and prohibits the wearing of religious clothing such as burkini in public swimming pools.

“By putting the hijab into the scope of “secularist attacks”, from “permit” to “terrorism,” this legislation (if passed) will aggravate racism and enhance the hostile environment facing Muslims, as well as people The hostile environment considered to be Muslim in France,” Amnesty International said.