Gwyneth Paltrow touts Blake Brown hair products in support of Blake Lively

Gwyneth Paltrow and Blake Lively
Dimitrios Cambris/FilmMagicGwyneth Paltrow Supporting Blake Lively and her hair care line Blake Brown.
After Lively was accused of sexual harassment It all ends with us co-starring and directing Justin Baldonishe has received support from the public, including Paltrow, 52. Baldoni strongly denies the claims, calling them “completely false, outrageous and deliberately obscene.”
Paltrow publicly expressed support for Lively, 37, on the day the complaint was released. Taking to Instagram Stories, she added Lively’s Blake Brown hair care range to her Christmas wish list, adding a queen emoji to her post.
According to the legal documents obtained US WeeklyBaldoni’s impact on the demolition campaign on Lively’s career was “immediate and substantial.” These include Blake Brown, a brand about It all ends with us“It will be released this summer.
Due to negative comments on social media, Lively claimed she felt she “could not continue to make public appearances or attend events without being forced to publicly discuss what happened on set.”
One of the incidents allegedly included the cancellation of a “critical” Target event for the hair care company and her not attending a scheduled appearance.
The lawsuit also claims retaliation against Lively also harmed her company, such as the launch of Blake Brown, which Lively spent seven years building.
“The launch of her long-planned hair care line, Blake Brown – more than a year ahead of the film’s chosen release date – has been mired in negative environmental opposition,” the filing reads. [Lively]”.
Before the “social manipulation” movement began, gossip Girl The actress learned that Blake Brown is Target’s biggest hair care launch ever. According to the Inside Sales Project, “sudden and unexpected negative media campaigns” negatively impacted product retail sales by as much as “56%–78%.”
What’s more, the brand’s Instagram account was allegedly filled with “harassing and derogatory comments, many of which were posted by user accounts with no followers and no previous posts,” according to court documents, suggesting the comments were untrue .